VEP-016 date_role#ExportRequested

[gilles landais]

Hello,

I respond in registry at ivoa.net -

But I highlight the BibVO proposal that deserves some discussion in DCP -
Do not hesitate to intervene. For instance, is the BibVO impact and its 
relation with DOI clear for everybody?

Cheers,

Gilles Landais

Le 05/03/2024 à 09:38, Markus Demleitner via datacp a écrit :
> Dear Semantics, Dear Registry, Dear DCP,
>
> Apologies for this deluge (it's because we had a bit of a backlog),
> but there is another Registry-related VEP: the addition of
> date_role#ExportRequested, which comes in the context of the recent
> BibVO note
> (http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/datacp/2024-February/000186.html).
>
> Here is its text:
>
>    Vocabulary: https://www.ivoa.net/rdf/voresource/date_role/
>    Author: Markus Demleitner <msdemlei at ari.uni-heidelberg.de>
>    Date: 2024-02-15
>
>    New Term: ExportRequested
>    Action: Addition
>    Label: Export Requested
>    Description: The date the publisher has requested non-VO bibliographic
> 	  services to pick up and index the metadata of the resource as per
> 	  the BibVO note.
>    Relationships:
>    Used-in: ivo://org.gavo.dc/gaia/s3/pub (or try
> 	  select ivoid from rr.res_date where value_role='exportrequested'
> 	  on your favourite RegTAP service)
>
>    Rationale:
> 	  Many resources in the VO Registry should not really be carried in
> 	  bibliographic services like the ADS; the proper way to credit them is
> 	  to cite the publications they accompany.  However, where resources do
> 	  not clearly belong to a (unique) publication, it may be a good idea to
> 	  encourage researchers to cite the VO resource itself, which means it
> 	  should be represented in bibliographic services.  Operators can
> 	  request that representation by obtaining a DOI for their VO resource
> 	  and setting a date with this role in the VO Registry.  See
> 	  https://ivoa.net/documents/Notes/BibVO/ for more information.
>
> I'm a bit split as to where we ought to discuss this, but given its
> presumably wider circulation and the origin of the vocabulary, I'd
> suggest comments should be sent to registry at ivoa.net.
>
> Thanks,
>
>             Markus
>