non vo standard listing

[Christophe Arviset]

Dear all

Indeed at ESA, we decided to also fill in the schema.org so all our datasets will also be properly referenced in Google Dataset Search. It does not cost much more to do so and we'd rather have all ESA space science datasets properly referenced there as well rather than not having them there at all.

--
Thanks in advance

Cheers

Christophe

PS: This e-mail might reach you during non-working hours. This is a matter of my personal work-life balance and travel schedule only.
I do not expect to receive a reply outside of your usual working hours.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Christophe ARVISET                       Christophe.Arviset at esa.int

Head of the Data Science and Archives Division
Science and Operations Department, Directorate of Science
European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC)
European Space Agency (ESA)

Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n
Urb. Villafranca del Castillo
28692 Villanueva de la Canada - Madrid - Spain
Cell: +34 655 05 43 03
-------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: datacp <datacp-bounces at ivoa.net> On Behalf Of August Muench via datacp
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 8:00 PM
To: datacp at ivoa.net; Markus Demleitner <msdemlei at ari.uni-heidelberg.de>
Subject: Re: non vo standard listing

Hi Markus,

I do not see a reason to press for Crossref, but I would press (and hope others will as well) for Schema.org.  ESA has, for instance, already embedded schema.org tags in their data landing pages and worked on the linking to Crossref (though they are moving to Datacite) metadata.

Masson, A., De Marchi, G., Merin, B., Sarmiento, M. H., Wenzel, D. L., & Martinez, B. (2021), Advances in Space Research, 67, 2504.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AdSpR..67.2504M/abstract

Additional schema.org bibliography is below my signature.

Gus

Abu Ahmad, R., D'Souza, J., Zloch, M., Otto, W., Rehm, G., Oelen, A., Dietze, S., & Auer, S. (2024), Toward FAIR Semantic Publishing of Research Dataset Metadata in the Open Research Knowledge Graph, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.08443.

Cecconi, B. (2024), FAIR approach for Low Frequency Radio Astronomy, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.03769.

Hertwig, E., Lammert, A., Höck, H., Fast, A., & Thiemann, H. (2023), WDCC - Improvement of FAIRness of an established repository, EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, EGU-5047.

Zwölf, C. M., & Moreau, N. (2023), Assessment of the FAIRness of the Virtual Atomic and Molecular Data Centre following the Research Data Alliance evaluation framework, European Physical Journal D, 77, 70.


________________________________________
From: datacp <datacp-bounces at ivoa.net> on behalf of Markus Demleitner via datacp <datacp at ivoa.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 11:30
To: datacp at ivoa.net
Subject: Re: non vo standard listing

Hi Gus,

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:05:10AM +0000, August Muench via datacp wrote:
> While I think that the "DOI" listing is useful, it is also only the
> tip of an iceberg!
>
> Datacite:
> https://sche/
> ma.datacite.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7CChristophe.Arviset%40esa.int%7C469ef
> 310542c4b7d225808dc80093004%7C9a5cacd02bef4dd7ac5c7ebe1f54f495%7C0%7C1
> %7C638526024155247675%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQ
> IjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C80000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ccWz
> Iw1sWHQDjrOaGLgUk7aqpbWv6yraou%2FDZf71xgk%3D&reserved=0

That one I'd list, yes; it greatly influences some of our vocabularies, at the very least.  And of course it's where our DOIs will come from, mostly.

> Crossref:
> https://www/.
> crossref.org%2Fdocumentation%2Fschema-library%2F&data=05%7C02%7CChrist
> ophe.Arviset%40esa.int%7C469ef310542c4b7d225808dc80093004%7C9a5cacd02b
> ef4dd7ac5c7ebe1f54f495%7C0%7C1%7C638526024155250547%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG
> Zsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%
> 3D%7C80000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3pkU1ChWurIIfLj5JDMmzbPhcxsjKfSRRF2n0PmTPoc%
> 3D&reserved=0

Are we doing anything with Crossref?  I couldn't point any specific place, if you don't want to count DOIs in content/source in the Registry that might contain Crossref-minted DOIs -- and I'd prefer not to count this.

> Schema.org:
> https://sche/
> ma.org%2Fdocs%2Fschemas.html&data=05%7C02%7CChristophe.Arviset%40esa.i
> nt%7C469ef310542c4b7d225808dc80093004%7C9a5cacd02bef4dd7ac5c7ebe1f54f4
> 95%7C0%7C1%7C638526024155253120%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLj
> AwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C80000%7C%7C%7C&
> sdata=3pl3NNnFvkcXwyk7ZyI9HUW7QcARjIEQvYY0pEgN%2BQI%3D&reserved=0

Again, I couldn't point to any specific place we're doing anything with stuff coming out of schema.org.  If I may indulge in a personal remark, I'm actually rather happy that we don't, given that, quoting from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema.org:

  Organization  Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, Yandex

         -- Markus

(who suddenly feels ten years younger given that Yahoo is in that
list...)

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).