SODA-1.0 - proposed erratum

[Molinaro, Marco]

Hi James,
thank you for pointing out the UCD opaqueness requirement that I didn't
enforce properly in my first solution attempt and for proposing a better
form of the impact text based on server side usage.

I think I correctly reflected them in the erratum twiki topic, please check.

@All: I don't think this erratum is complicated or controversial, so I
suggest
you take a look at it and comment at your earlier convenience so we can
push it to TCG consideration quickly.

Deadline to have it reviewed in Paris is we agree within DAL
by this Friday, April the 19th.

Cheers
     Marco

Il giorno mar 16 apr 2019 alle ore 10:04 Dempsey, James (IM&T, Yarralumla)
<James.Dempsey at csiro.au> ha scritto:

> Hi Marco,
>
>
>
> The erratum proposes to change the UCD for the ID parameter. In the text
> the ID is described as an opaque ID and the UCDs then imply that they
> should either be URLs (old UCD of meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA) or URIs
> (new UCD of meta.ref.uri;meta.dataset).
>
>
>
> However I think these might be better to be something like meta.id;meta.dataset
> and thus allow the provider to use any format of ID and thus preserve the
> opaqueness.
>
>
>
> In the CASDA implementation we use a composite value for the ID which also
> carries authorisation information so is in no way an IVO ID or even a URI.
> This is something I had missed when implementing the spec, however this
> solves a requirement for us where the authorisation has to be handed from
> one system to another.
>
>
>
> On a much more minor note, in the impact assessment section, could you
> change the statement “won’t .. have any impact on the service provider’s
> side” to “will have minimal impact on the service provider’s side” please.
> At least in the CASDA case we would need to amend the UCD and make a
> release, to remain compliant so there is some (simple) work to be done.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> James Dempsey
>
>
>
> *From:* dal-bounces at ivoa.net <dal-bounces at ivoa.net> *On Behalf Of *Molinaro,
> Marco
> *Sent:* Friday, 12 April 2019 11:51 PM
> *To:* IVOA DAL <dal at ivoa.net>
> *Cc:* IVOA semantics <semantics at ivoa.net>
> *Subject:* SODA-1.0 - proposed erratum
>
>
>
> Dear DAL,
>
> dear Semantics (cross-posting reason: UCD involved),
>
>
>
> I've been alerted (private email, Alberto) of a potential erratum
>
> for the SODA-1.0 specification, dealing with a wrong UCD for
>
> the ID parameter of that specification.
>
>
>
> Quite late on it I moved the alert received into a proposed erratum;
>
> you can find it here:
>
>
>
> https://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/SODA-1_0-Err-1
>
>
>
> Please comment and discuss it.
>
> After we get to a useful conclusion I'll report it to the TCG.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>       Marco
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dal/attachments/20190416/8992acfe/attachment.html>