schema_index in TAP_SCHEMA.schemas?

[Marco Molinaro]

Hi Walter, hi everybody,
I think it depends on a "there was no requirement for it", so, it may be
seen as a sort of an oversight.

Probably it s related to the fact that TAP content and VOSI tables are
more tableset prone than really [catalog].schema.table.

I'm in favor of adding the schema_index.

Cheers,
     Marco


2017-03-26 0:09 GMT+01:00 Walter Landry <wlandry at caltech.edu>:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> The current working draft for TAP 1.1 enhances the TAP_SCHEMA tables
> to include
>
>   TAP_SCHEMA.tables.table_index
>   TAP_SCHEMA.columns.column_index
>
> That is great, but there is no corresponding
>
>   TAP_SCHEMA.schemas.schema_index
>
> Was that intentional or an oversight?  Here at IRSA, we split the
> schemas by mission and we like to order them by what we consider
> important (e.g. first WISE, then Spitzer, then 2MASS).
>
> Thanks,
> Walter Landry