ADQL MOD

[Marco Molinaro]

Dave,
thanks for the quick check and doc revision.

2016-07-06 8:58 GMT+02:00 Dave Morris <dave.morris at metagrid.co.uk>:
>
> On 2016-07-06 23:19, Patrick Dowler wrote:
>>
>> Oh, I agree that the argument order is simply a bug/erratum for ADQL;
>
>
> Fixed in next version
> https://volute.g-vo.org/viewvc/volute/trunk/projects/dal/ADQL/ADQL.tex?r1=3385&r2=3456
>
> Do we need to publish an errata for 2.0 ?

Since ADQL-2.1 is not yet in REC nor PR I suppose we'd have to put this as a
proposed erratum to ADQL-2.0.

If you agree I'll add this to the

http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/ADQL-2_0-Next

"Proposed Errata" section including the mail thread reference.

Cheers,
     Marco

>
>> For the treatment of negative args, I would have thought the
>> mathematical definition is clear (As Marco said: A%B=R is valid with R
>> having the same sign as A). That should probably be specified clearly
>> and test results (Cosmopterix) would be useful to tell implementers
>> whether they have to do something.
>
>
> Yep, working on it.
>
> Dave
>
>
> --------
> Dave Morris
> Software Developer
> Wide Field Astronomy Unit
> Institute for Astronomy
> University of Edinburgh
> --------
>