ADQL MOD

[Dave Morris]

On 2016-07-06 23:19, Patrick Dowler wrote:
> Oh, I agree that the argument order is simply a bug/erratum for ADQL;

Fixed in next version
https://volute.g-vo.org/viewvc/volute/trunk/projects/dal/ADQL/ADQL.tex?r1=3385&r2=3456

Do we need to publish an errata for 2.0 ?

> For the treatment of negative args, I would have thought the
> mathematical definition is clear (As Marco said: A%B=R is valid with R
> having the same sign as A). That should probably be specified clearly
> and test results (Cosmopterix) would be useful to tell implementers
> whether they have to do something.

Yep, working on it.

Dave


--------
Dave Morris
Software Developer
Wide Field Astronomy Unit
Institute for Astronomy
University of Edinburgh
--------