table_name syntax

Patrick Dowler patrick.dowler at nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
Wed May 13 18:25:40 CEST 2015



On 13/05/15 08:59 AM, Patrick Dowler wrote:
>
> I agree completely...  But, there has always been a user case or
> requirement that someone should be able to implement a tap service
> without having to modify incoming ADQL into internal SQL. Personally, I
> think that ship sailed a long time ago and it would be crazy to
> implement a completely pass-through tap service that just executed
> whatever ADQL the user provided...
>
> But yeah, *I* would expose foo..bar but someone might want to :-)

Doh! I mean: I "would not" :-)


> Pat
>
>
> On 13/05/15 03:30 AM, Dave Morris wrote:
>> Internally we run SQLServer, which like Sybase, does use foo..bar
>>
>> However, our ADQL service hides all the implementation details,
>> providing an abstract layer which publishes our tables as foo.bar rather
>> than foo..bar or foo.dbo.bar which is what they are underneath.
>>
>> We would not expose foo..bar as part of a TAP service in TAP_SCHEMA or
>> in VOSI.
>

-- 

Patrick Dowler
Canadian Astronomy Data Centre
National Research Council Canada
5071 West Saanich Road
Victoria, BC V9E 2E7

250-363-0044 (office) 250-363-0045 (fax)


More information about the dal mailing list