SSA-1.1
Petr Skoda
skoda at sunstel.asu.cas.cz
Mon Apr 18 06:43:35 PDT 2011
>
> Unless there is something left to discuss, I want to move SSA-1.1 to RFC at
> the end of this week (2011-04-15).
I am extremely sorry for bothering again so late with the SSA changes, but
this one (I hope) cannot break any working service but might improve the
handling of VO archives by astronomers:
I have realized the problem two days ago when trying to make
SSA-compatible archive of one set of 2m telescope spectra (with max
magnitude available say 13m) and no I am pretty sure its
important to hint the spectra providers and give them proper rules how to
implement this.
The problems concerns the SSA TARGETNAME query vs POS.
When an astronomer looks for spectra of some target, he uses VOSPEC or
SPLAT-VO and in fact the vast majority of SSA services supports only POS
query. So the usual expectation is - you call name resolver to get
coordinates and make the POS query.
But, even in our relatively bright stars spectra archive there are stars
that are not recognized by any resolver (eg most GALEX stars, stars with
KEPLER names etc ...) or people are using different nomenclature
(e.g. GALEX J193156.8+011745)
Those come from special catalogues and the astronomer has only solution to
look up the coordinates in given catalog, convert to ICRS decimal degrees
and enter in POS field in given tool.
In addition (as I was showing several times at interops) there are cases
(e.g. in binary star research) when you cannot use the coordinates to
distinguish the particular spectrum (e.g. component of close spectroscopic
binary - e.g HR1847A and HR1847B. The components are very close and have
the same pointing in FITS header, but during the spectrum extraction
(position on the slit) you get either spectrum of A or B component.
Of course there not in SIMBAD distinguished.
So for this purpose we have the TARGETNAME query (not only solar system
databse needs it).
So I can ask for TARGETNAME=HR1847B or TARGETNAME=GALEXxxxx+yyyyy or
IRASxx+yy etc ...
But it could help a lot to have a explicitely defined way how to define
the names for TARGETNAME that all servers would support (and I would be
very glad to see the status of TARGETNAME in 4.1.2 to be changed to REC
(from OPT).
To get anything if blindly asking the unknown archive a some kind of
wildcard or regular pattern is important.
Probably the esiest way would be to refer to SIMBAD resolver wildcards
http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-fid
following the unix filename patterns but I am not sure about the problems
in http URL encoding.
Some web based (not SSA) archives are using SQL wildcards %
or _ for the LIKE operator and it is directly translated to database
query.
So I suggest to extend the sec 4.1.2.8 TARGETNAME by adding the sentence:
----------------------------------------------
The TARGETNAME parameter may contain the wildcards according to the
XXXXXXXXXXXXX convention (for example .......) which the server should
translate to the appropriate call to database.
-----------------------------------------------
There should be explicitly said XXXXX = SIMBAD resolver or XXXXX=SQL
and we should clarify if the parameter value is case sensitive or not and
how the white spaces are understood.
e.g. "Theta 2 TAU" or V475cYg" and if the [abc]something is supported
I hope that this issue could be solved quickly refering to some already
existing handling of patterns ....
probably some kind of limits like MAXREC will have to be applied according
to server's internal setting
and what is your opinion about making TARGETNAME a REComended parameter ?
I suppose that most spectra metadata are converted from FITS headers and
it was a good practice in observation to give every object a name.
*************************************************************************
* Petr Skoda Phone : +420-323-649201, ext. 361 *
* Stellar Department +420-323-620361 *
* Astronomical Institute AS CR Fax : +420-323-620250 *
* 251 65 Ondrejov e-mail: skoda at sunstel.asu.cas.cz *
* Czech Republic *
*************************************************************************
More information about the dal
mailing list