SAMP MType parameters issue

[Luigi Paioro]

Even if I do not see the necessity of this more restrictive BNF, 
personally I have no objections.

Luigi

Juan de Dios Santander Vela ha scritto:
> There are other languages (C) for which identifiers can only be of the 
> form you are expressing, and many languages with C runtimes share the 
> same restrictions.
> 
> However, I would go for identifier as:
> 
> identifier ::= (letter) (letter | digit | "_")*
> 
> ¿Do you think this is too restrictive? I don't see the point of named 
> parameters which use _variableName, as this is typically done for hidden 
> properties... And I think we should allow MType identifiers to be legal 
> identifiers in all (most) languages... even if a protocol identifier 
> does not need to correspond one to one to variables in a computer language.
> 

-- 

Luigi Paioro

INAF - IASF Milano
Via Bassini 15, I-20133 Milano, Italy

Phone  (+39) 02 23 699 470
Fax    (+39) 02 26 660 17
Site   http://www.iasf-milano.inaf.it/luigi/