SAMP MType parameters issue

[Bruno Rino]

Please make it a requirement.
Freedom at this level only creates headaches further down the road...

> So, my vote is in favour of changing these parameter names as Luigi 
> suggests, and introducing at least a RECOMMENDation (or should it be a 
> REQUIREment?) in the standard that future MTypes use parameter and 
> (for symmetry) return value names following the suggested BNF.
>