Can you help with VOEvent2?
Frederic V. Hessman
Hessman at Astro.physik.Uni-Goettingen.DE
Wed Mar 9 23:33:52 PST 2011
I agree with Roy, the sentence is a bit obfuscatory. How about
"The <Reference> element has a more sophisticated notion of type: it
is a general URI reference to a wide range of possible content rather
than just a simple HTML link."
Rick
On 8 Mar 2011, at 19:03, Roy Williams wrote:
> Rick and Norman
>
> It would be fabulous if you could comment on the new VOEvent2
> specification, in particular the part where it says "The <Reference>
> element has a more sophisticated notion of type as a general URI
> rather than enumeration of a few.", which is better defined in
> section 3.9.
>
> Can you bless this change or not? Just write a comment to the
> VOEvent working group.
> Thank you
> Roy
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Bringing VOEvent v2.0 home to roost
> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:54:39 -0700
> From: Rob Seaman <seaman at noao.edu>
> To: IVOA List VOEvent <voevent at ivoa.net>
>
> Roy and Bob Denny and I have been working on VOEvent v2.0. Some
> amount
> of IVOA wordsmithing is required at the top of the document, as well
> as
> a review of the references, etc. The actual description of the
> standard
> is finished and it's ready for others to rip into it (with some
> editorial comments at the top). Bob's name needs to be add to the
> author list.
>
> Appended for your review are html, schema and a diagram from Bob.
> I'll
> avoid further setting of the stage at this point.
>
> Comments?
>
> Rob
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <VOEvent-20110215.html>
More information about the voevent
mailing list