Can you help with VOEvent2?

Frederic V. Hessman Hessman at Astro.physik.Uni-Goettingen.DE
Wed Mar 9 23:33:52 PST 2011


I agree with Roy, the sentence is a bit obfuscatory.  How about

"The <Reference> element has a more sophisticated notion of type: it  
is a general URI reference to a wide range of possible content rather  
than just a simple HTML link."

Rick

On 8 Mar 2011, at 19:03, Roy Williams wrote:

> Rick and Norman
>
> It would be fabulous if you could comment on the new VOEvent2  
> specification, in particular the part where it says "The <Reference>  
> element has a more sophisticated notion of type as a general URI  
> rather than enumeration of a few.", which is better defined in  
> section 3.9.
>
> Can you bless this change or not? Just write a comment to the  
> VOEvent working group.
> Thank you
> Roy
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Bringing VOEvent v2.0 home to roost
> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:54:39 -0700
> From: Rob Seaman <seaman at noao.edu>
> To: IVOA List VOEvent <voevent at ivoa.net>
>
> Roy and Bob Denny and I have been working on VOEvent v2.0.  Some  
> amount
> of IVOA wordsmithing is required at the top of the document, as well  
> as
> a review of the references, etc.  The actual description of the  
> standard
> is finished and it's ready for others to rip into it (with some
> editorial comments at the top).  Bob's name needs to be add to the
> author list.
>
> Appended for your review are html, schema and a diagram from Bob.   
> I'll
> avoid further setting of the stage at this point.
>
> Comments?
>
> Rob
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <VOEvent-20110215.html>



More information about the voevent mailing list