0MQ: The Intelligent Transport Layer

[Matthew Graham]

Hi,

Agreed but considerations should include:

- Is there conceptually anything wrong with the existing infrastructure?
- Is it just a case that the current tools are not good enough and no-one has been bothered enough to dedicate some time to sorting this out?
- What exactly are our use cases for event transport?
	
	Cheers,

	Matthew

On Dec 20, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Alasdair Allan wrote:

> XMPP/Jabber is pubsub, that's not necessarily the only architecture you want to think about for event transport.
> 
> Al.
> -- 
> Sent from my iPad.
> 
> On 20 Dec 2011, at 23:37, Matthew Graham <mjg at cacr.caltech.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I guess my reaction is what's wrong with XMPP/Jabber that this solves?
>> 
>>   Cheers,
>> 
>>   Matthew
>> 
>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Roy Williams wrote:
>> 
>>> As we continue to wrestle with VOEvent transport, new (and simpler) protocols arrive. This looks promising ....
>>> 
>>> http://www.zeromq.org/
>>> 
>>> Anyone have any experience with this?
>>> Roy
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> Caltech LIGO
>>> roy at caltech.edu
>>> 626 395 3670
>>> 
>> 
>