VOEvent sessions in Victoria

[Rob Seaman]

Of course the other IVOA members are important, but I thought I would  
rattle the branches a few more times among the WG.

Intending to attend an InterOp likely says more about one's "posture"  
with respect to the IVOA than it does about VOEvent or transient  
response astronomy.  We have no trouble getting participants for  
external meetings such as Hotwired, Eventful Universe or the upcoming  
SPIE sessions.

I'd also like to see broader participation than the Tucson-Pasadena  
axis if we're going to focus on wrapping up v2.0.  My suspicion is  
that the bulk of this effort will need to occur remotely.  That will  
tend to result in different "style" sessions in Victoria.

Rob
---

On Mar 30, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Matthew Graham wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've always maintained that we were a little short of a quorum!
>
> What about all the other IVOA members who will be attending - don't  
> they make this quorate?
>
> 	Cheers,
>
> 	Matthew
>
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Rob Seaman wrote:
>
>> List so far for the Victoria InterOp:
>>
>> 				attending		not
>> 	Rob			     X
>> 	Matthew		     X
>> 	Roy			     X
>> 	Alasdair					 X
>>
>> This remains short of a quorum.  Keep those cards and letters coming.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>