VOEvent session

Matthew Graham mjg at cacr.caltech.edu
Wed Dec 15 23:43:49 PST 2010


Hi,

On Dec 15, 2010, at 11:36 PM, Frederic V. Hessman wrote:

> While this discourse is reasonably entertaining, I keep forgetting the point.....

I couldn't agree more. The issue on the table is how to reconcile the various time series representations proposed in VOEvent 2.0 with the serialization of the IVOA time series data model. My preference is to drop simpleTimeSeries and see what needs to be done to <Table> to bring it in line - is it just a case of adding a 'utype' attribute and prescribing which utypes to use when representing a time series?

	Cheers,

	Matthew


More information about the voevent mailing list