features for VOEvent v2.0

[Roy Williams]

Rob Seaman wrote:
> Helpfully revised per the vice-chair:
>
> Ballot instructions - mark one-and-only-one column in each-and-every row:
>
> 1) VOEvent v2.0:        ( ) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 	1a) called v1.2:(x) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 2) time-series:         ( ) yes  (x) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 3) simple tables:       ( ) yes  (x) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 4) orbital elements:    (x) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 	4a) ephemerides:(x) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 5) <reference> typing:  (x) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 6) <param> typing:      (x) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 7) non-empty params:    (x) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 	7a) references: (x) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 	7b) descripts:  (x) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 	7c) multi-line: (x) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 8) physical inferences  (x) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 9) simple STC:          (x) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 10) robust schema:      (x) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
> 11) Stream template:    (x) yes  ( ) no  ( ) don't care  ( ) don't understand
>
> If you have comments, complaints, questions or wish to suggest features not mentioned - send a SEPARATE message (to voevent at ivoa.net).  The chair is attempting to statistically sample the WG.
>
> First: what is the consensus?
> Second: what are we going to do about it?
>
> Rob
>
>   

-- 

California Institute of Technology
626 395 3670