Alternate proposal for digital signatures
Steve Allen
sla at ucolick.org
Wed Mar 19 07:48:09 PDT 2008
On Wed 2008-03-19T01:15:56 -0700, Rob Seaman hath writ:
> >the most adaptable key-trust architecture is PGP's, thus it is the
> >most likely to fit whatever trust model(s) end up being required.
>
> Anybody else want to assay an opinion here? Are these two options the
> only candidates? Is either fatally flawed? Are there unique and
> valuable features of one choice, missing from the other?
Rob, you should know better than to ask some questions if I'm online
http://www.xkcd.com/364/
--
Steve Allen <sla at ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855
University of California Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m
More information about the voevent
mailing list