Alternate proposal for digital signatures

Steve Allen sla at ucolick.org
Wed Mar 19 07:48:09 PDT 2008


On Wed 2008-03-19T01:15:56 -0700, Rob Seaman hath writ:
> >the most adaptable key-trust architecture is PGP's, thus it is the
> >most likely to fit whatever trust model(s) end up being required.
>
> Anybody else want to assay an opinion here?  Are these two options the
> only candidates?  Is either fatally flawed?  Are there unique and
> valuable features of one choice, missing from the other?

Rob, you should know better than to ask some questions if I'm online

http://www.xkcd.com/364/

--
Steve Allen                 <sla at ucolick.org>                WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory        Natural Sciences II, Room 165    Lat  +36.99855
University of California    Voice: +1 831 459 3046           Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064        http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/     Hgt +250 m



More information about the voevent mailing list