The State of VOEvent
Rob Seaman
seaman at noao.edu
Fri Jun 6 14:23:22 PDT 2008
Howdy,
Thanks to everybody who participated in VOEvent related activities in
Trieste. In particular, the great success of VOEvent to date owes
everything to Roy's able leadership over the past three years.
VOEvent related activities are not slowing down, however, but rather
are poised to ramp steeply upwards. No rest for the weary with GLAST
and Pan-STARRS and Dark Energy Survey and LSST and on and on looming
over us. I'll describe the key near-term action items below - as I
perceive them. If there are others, please speak up early and often
to make sure your priorities receive attention from the group.
First, another plug for the unique time domain observing opportunity
provided by our kind collaborators of the HTN:
http://www.telescope-networks.org/cfp
ACTION ITEMS:
1) Finalize VOEvent v2.0 by the Fall 2008 InterOp:
A) A key item here is to enhance the VOEvent schema to better support
time series data. The hope is that this can benefit from the work
done for the Spectral Data Model. We will need a first draft in the
next month to be ready in time for Baltimore.
B) Another item is to specify the correct handling of STC-based
orbital elements for our purposes. STC is pretty clear-cut here, so
this will mostly consist of demonstrating our ability to capture,
convey and usefully present orbits from author to subscriber.
C) Formalize the hook for conveying events from outside communities
using external schema. This is already happening with the
Heliophysics Knowledgebase.
D) We have pressed the Semantics WG to advance the vocabulary
initiative. They responded admirably. It is now up to us to make use
of this. Let's wrap it up with a pretty bow and put controlled
vocabularies to use.
E) KML support. This may only involve allowing an explicit kml type
for a <Reference>. It may involve more than that.
2) Initiatives in parallel to v2.0:
A) Authentication. The sense of the WG in Trieste was that digital
signatures not be embedded within VOEvent packets themselves. Two
distinct technologies have been proposed. Each has already been
prototyped. Now we need a coherent pilot project to carry one or both
of these forward in a VOEventNet-wide fashion. There is no reason to
create a signature if nobody will later check it - this implies
support of one sort or another within our browsers. Let's find a
middle road between racing forward willy-nilly on the one hand - and
doing nothing at all on the other. In addition, I'd also like to
evaluate a lightweight checksum scheme for use within a packet,
similar to the FITS Checksum convention.
B) Registry support. Roy identified two types of VOEvent entries, a
VOEventStream and a VOEventServer. The first is a scientific entity,
the second a technical/logistical entity. VOEvent can benefit even
more than most VO activities from registering our resources. We have
a geographically distributed, multi-purpose community seeking fully
autonomous operations requiring short latency, high reliability
notification. Such a network is not going to be connected up manually
like tinker-toys.
C) SEAP - the Simple Event Access Protocol, that is - query for
VOEvent. Transient alert astronomy brings two additional requirements
to query protocols: the specific need to interoperate seamlessly with
resource discovery (in particular, multiple repositories may host the
same data), and the defining characteristic of the community of
issuing rules-based queries in advance of the observations.
3) Ongoing activities:
A) VOEventNet continues to grow. In fact, transient alert astronomy
has involved a deployed network of resources since before the Trans-
Atlantic Cable in 1866. Our goal is to provide a protocol that can be
used to represent any astronomical "event" - any report of celestial
behavior with a time domain component. This carries within it the
implicit need to manage the network of publishers and subscribers
conveying those reports.
B) VO-GCN is the NASA funded project to relayer the Gamma-ray bursts
Coordinates Network on VOEvent. We (Roy and his co-Is) plan to submit
a follow-on proposal for the next AISR round. Much has been
accomplished, much remains to do.
C) Collaboration with HTN continues, especially through the good
auspices of eSTAR, but LCOGT is coming up on the outside. Autonomous
observing assets seem a very safe bet for the future development of
the ground-based O/IR system. They have long been the norm for space-
based observatories. Several interesting projects are in the works
for other parts of the EM spectrum as well as for non-EM experiments
in GR, neutrinos and high energy particles. VOEvent should remain
engaged with all such efforts.
D) Recruitment of new partners with new event streams. No need to
belabor this one.
4) Meetings in the coming year:
- HTN-IV - Santa Barbara, July 2008. A targeted workshop.
- InterOp - Baltimore, October 2008. Sessions?
- ADASS - Quebec, November 2008. Tutorial and/or BoF.
- VOEvent IV - Western USA, Spring 2009?
...followed by more InterOps, ADASSes, SPIE meetings, etc.
5) Documentation:
- VOEvent v2.0 standard (and schema) [Seaman]
- VOEvent transport notes [Allan]
- VOEvent vocabulary (as needed to augment IVOAT) [Hessman]
- VOEvent Users Guide [all]
[Lead author in brackets.]
Only the first document is normative.
Anyway, that's how I see the work in front of us for the near to
medium term. Over the longer term, the heart of the enterprise should
shift from simply publishing, transporting, and subscribing to event
streams, toward semantic characterization and correlation of the
underlying celestial phenomena. Autonomous follow-up will begin to
shade over toward more creative forms of machine decision making.
Please consider how your organization may participate in these
specific activities - and remind me of items I've neglected to mention.
Rob Seaman
NOAO
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ivoa.net/pipermail/voevent/attachments/20080606/b6ac2aff/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the voevent
mailing list