Wide or Narrow Schema for VOEvent?
Alasdair Allan
aa at astro.ex.ac.uk
Thu Mar 31 16:23:50 PST 2005
Rob Seaman wrote:
> Alasdair Allan says:
>> I would suggest that STC is one of several possible starting places,
>> and wouldn't have been my initial choice.
>
> Ok - I'll cheerfully admit my ignorance of these several alternatives.
I didn't use the word alternatives, I said starting places...
> What would your initial choice have been?
To roll a very simple XML representation of RA, Dec, Epoch and Equinox
and leave the door open for this in-house effort to be substituted for
in actual VOEvent messages by either a alternative (more complex) XML
document if that's what's needed (because we're working in some weird
and wonderful co-ordinate system for instance) or by some other
serialised (perhaps proprietary) co-ordinate representation that may be
project specific.
Off the top of my head,
<Coordinates>
<RightAscension format="hh mm ss.s" units="hms">24 00
00.0</RightAscension>
<Declination format="sdd mm ss.s" units="dms">+45 00
00.0</Declination>
<Equinox>J2000</Equinox>
<Epoch>2005.34</Epoch>
</Coordinates>
would have done me just fine, probably along with something as simple
as,
<DateObs time="UTC">2005-03-18T12:36:19.619</DateObs>
as a date stamp.
Al.
More information about the voevent
mailing list