Fwd: IVOA Standard Documents
Marco C. Leoni
mleoni at eso.org
Fri Apr 2 06:11:01 PST 2004
Hi Jonathan,
I'm forwarding your mail to the stdproc list ..... as you said,
discussion about the the standards document recommendation should be
addressed there.
Cheers,
Marco
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
>Marco wrote:
>
>
>
>>Well, html is the standard format for IVOA documents
>>
>>
>
>[This is now beyond the scope of the voql list, but anyway...]
>Marco, although I support the decision to make HTML the canonical
>format for IVOA, I didn't realize we were going to be so restrictive,
>and I think we may need eventually to revise this rule.
> I think there are two roles for documents -
> a source version which someone might use as a starting point for changes
> a representation which is easy to read for everyone
>and I think both should be found on the official IVOA documents page,
>in multiple formats. HTML is in theory good for both because everyone
>can access it, although in practice it does not always come out the
>same in different browsers. PDF is also pretty good because I think
>it's easy to read and print for most people, but it's not a source version.
>Still it should be allowed as it's much easier to print a big PDF than
>a big HTML. And the operating system specific formats - latex and postscript
>for Unix, .doc for Microsoft - are good for source but each is inconvenient
>for some users - still I think they should both be findable on the
>official page, not just the twiki, if they are provided, AS LONG AS they
>are accompanied by a universally printable format version (HTML or, I would
>argue, PDF).
> I worry that the current system may become so inflexible and
>inconvenient that people will end up just bypassing it. It would be much
>better if the IVOA Documents tree were the default place people went
>to find the official document they wanted, the WG twikis are not optimal
>for this.
> - Jonathan McDowell
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ivoa.net/pipermail/stdproc/attachments/20040402/ca237e55/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the stdproc
mailing list