[Heig] vocabulary update: proposal for dataproduct_type update for high energy data : event-list definition and event-bundle

[Markus Demleitner]

Dear Colleagues,

On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:11:37AM +0200, Bruno Khelifi via semantics wrote:
> > hold or is it the other way round?
> As a simple physicist, I do not know that means #skos:broader. In words, an
> event-list is contained into an event-bundle, because
> event-bundle=event-list+IRFs+provenance+etc

Well, I think that nails it, and it seems the relationship is that
#event-bundle is a narrower term than both #event-list and *#irf.

If you find time this afternoon could you, together with Mireille,
extend the VEP to include *#irf (or whatever; I suspect a different
identifer and label would be great) as a second new term?
As usual, try to make the definition as precise as possible; a few
guidelines are available at

https://ivoa.net/documents/Vocabularies/20230206/REC-Vocabularies-2.1.html#tth_sEc5.2.4

And then #event-bundle would also be narrower than *#irf.

I suppose *#irf would only become relevant in a datalink document
(the content_qualifier).  As I said, it would be *really* good if
there was a datalilnk document online already that uses that term by
the time we publish the VEP.  Any chance for that?  And can we have
an #event-bundle in some obscore table, too?

Note that if you have publishable data of that kind but just don't
have the resources to publish them right now, I'm happy to fill in and
publish it on http://dc.g-vo.org).

Thanks,

            Markus