Proposed Endorsed note for UCD List version 1.4

[Mark Taylor]

I didn't read the whole thing, but skimming it came up with the
following issues:

Section 2:
   "some.log.ucd.x" should read "some.long.ucd.x"

Appendix A.2:
   The bibliography reference to the document 
   "Maintenance of the list of UCD words" is to version 1.20 
   of that document, which describes the previous process of 
   issuing REC track documents.  Shouldn't this be to version 2.0 
   of that document which describes the process using Endorsed Notes?

   (I note that version 2.0 of the document is referenced by URL 
   in the abstract, along with another document referenced by URL; 
   I'm not sure what the policy is for which documents are 
   referenced by URL and which are referenced via the Bibliography).

Appendix E.1:
   It says:
   "Clarified position rules for syntax code E, C, V in Appendix B."
   But I don't see that in Appendix B. Could you mean Section 2?

Mark

On Mon, 3 May 2021, Mireille LOUYS wrote:

> Hello everyone ,
> 
> This Proposed Endorsed Note is in the last step for validation by TCG .
> This UCD list of terms has been prepared following the UCD maintenance
> procedure and discussed in the Semantics working group.
> 
> The abstract describes in short  the historical path of the document.
> 
> We would be very grateful if you could review the document, provide comments
> and suggestions and help us to promote it to an Endorsed Note.
> 
> We are looking forward to your comments till May 21.
> Many thanks ,
> 
> Mireille (Louys) , Baptiste (Cecconi)
> 
> -- 
> --
> Mireille Louys,  MCF (Associate Professor)
> Centre de données CDS		IPSEO, Images, Laboratoire Icube
> Observatoire de Strasbourg	Telecom Physique Strasbourg
> 11 rue de l'Université		300, Bd Sebastien Brandt CS 10413
> F- 67000-STRASBOURG		F-67412 ILLKIRCH Cedex
> Tel: +33 3 68 85 24 34
> 
> 

--
Mark Taylor  Astronomical Programmer  Physics, Bristol University, UK
m.b.taylor at bristol.ac.uk          http://www.star.bristol.ac.uk/~mbt/