Object types semantics

[Stéphane Erard]

Yes, this the way to go. « planet » clearly needs to be adapted. 
But we may have difficulties with at least the « sky » value in EPN-TAP.

Stéphane

> Le 3 déc. 2021 à 11:40, Francoise Genova <francoise.genova at astro.unistra.fr> a écrit :
> 
> Just to clarify the fact that the Ontology of Object Types is only an IVOA Note and not an IVOA standard.
> 
> All best
> Francoise
> 
> Le 03/12/2021 à 11:38, Baptiste Cecconi a écrit :
>> Dear List, 
>> 
>> A recent message reminded me that we have this this object-type vocabulary. 
>> 
>> I checked the list quickly and it is "purely" astrophysics, and solar system is not included. It is particularly clear with: 
>> https://www.ivoa.net/rdf/object-type#planet 
>> which explicitly refers to "extra-solar planet". 
>> 
>> In EPNcore, we have a list of target-type which would fit into this vocabulary. If you agree, we (VESPA team + SSIG) can come up with a merging proposal. 
>> 
>> Baptiste
>> 
>> 
>>> Début du message réexpédié :
>>> 
>>> De: Markus Demleitner <msdemlei at ari.uni-heidelberg.de>
>>> Objet: Rép : Question - History of ivoa onto of astronomical object types
>>> Date: 3 décembre 2021 à 09:15:34 UTC+1
>>> À: semantics at ivoa.net
>>> 
>>>   Our current effort, http://www.ivoa.net/rdf/object-type/,
>> 
> 
>