[QUAR] Re: Expressing position in RDF
Brian Thomas
thomas at astro.umd.edu
Tue Oct 14 13:15:40 PDT 2008
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 02:59:08 pm Matthew Graham wrote:
> I'm happy for the philosophical discussion but am also trying to
> figure out how to actually do something empirical. I can see exactly
> the same arguments that we had about using STC in VOEvent applying to
> representing positions in RDF. The 90:10 rule should apply and whilst
> it is wonderful that I can describe any position in any coordinate
> system using ontology X, why can't we have ontology Y that is small
> and simple (that word again):
>
> :myStar stc:UTC-TOPO-FK5#RA 134.56
>
Oops. I guess I should read all the email before responding in order of arrival. Yes, I think
this is the right approach.
=brian
More information about the semantics
mailing list