Vocab AND Ontology?

[Ed Shaya]

Rob Seaman wrote:
>
>  Rather than adding to the Thesaurus, perhaps we should be considering 
> renorming it into separate sub-vocabularies.  This will clarify the 
> missing pieces (e.g., GRBs) needed for pragmatic transient reporting 
> and classification.
This sounds like a good idea.  Could you create a subset of the skos/rdf 
file that covers just voevent terminology?  Then we could work on 
ensuring that we have what we need for that.

Ed