About VO registry

[Jorge A. Pérez Prieto]

Dear Markus and Costas,

great! thanks a lot, now they appear in the GAVO directory and pyVO. 
Nevertheless, they still are not shown in the NVO and MAST directories 
or Aladin 10 (they do in Aladin 9); it's not critical but bit strange.

Regards and thanks again,
Jorge

O 24/05/19 ás 10:26, Markus Demleitner escribiu:
> Dear Jorge, hi Costas,
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:35:31PM +0300, Kostandin Vrioni wrote:
>> I have been using the Euro-VO Registry for many years to register
>> some VO services of my institution (IAC, Tenerife, Spain) and I am
>> very happy the application, so many thanks for your work.
>> We are having an issue with the discovery of our services
>> registered in the Euro-VO Registry and maybe you can help me.
>> Although the services seems to work correctly, for example (SIAP):
>>            
>> ivo://iacvo/IAC80
>>         ivo://iacvo/PSZ1y2
>> I'm not been able to find them in most part of the VO discovery
>> tools; I've tried these:
> Interesting.  Let's see: The OAI-PMH interface at the EuroVO Registry
> actually delivers the record *now* when asked about it
> (http://registry.euro-vo.org/oai.jsp?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=ivo_vor&identifier=ivo://iacvo/IAC80)
> and even includes it when asked what changed when that record last
> changed:
> http://registry.euro-vo.org/oai.jsp?verb=ListRecords&metadataPrefix=ivo_vor&from=2018-12-21&until=2018-12-22&set=ivo_managed.
>
> Meanwhile, none of my registry mirrors had seen that record in what
> they harvested over the last six month or so (which, of course, the
> do for the Euro-VO publishing registry, too).
>
> I didn't bring all that together  and told the Heidelberg mirror to
> just do a full re-harvest of the EuroVO publishing registry.  And lo
> and behold, the records are now there.  They're now available in
> TOPCAT (Aladin will take a bit longer, probably until tomorrow).
>
> I can't quite say what happened (Theresa, who holds a lot more
> history than I do, might be able to provide more insight), but I
> suspect the records made it into the publishing registry quite a bit
> after the datestamp and thus were lost in incremental harvesting.
> The weak part of that theory is that the records are old enough to
> have been part of the initial harvest.  Why they were missing there I
> really can't say.
>
> Costas, I think the best way to fix the problem on all searchable
> registries (without requiring their operators to do a full
> re-harvest) would be to bump the datestamp on these (and perhaps
> other records that may share their fate) to today.  That way,
> incremental harvesting will bring them back without further
> intervention.
>
> Thanks,
>
>             Markus
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADVERTENCIA: Sobre la privacidad y cumplimiento de la Ley de Protección de Datos, acceda a http://www.iac.es/disclaimer.php
WARNING: For more information on privacy and fulfilment of the Law concerning the Protection of Data, consult http://www.iac.es/disclaimer.php?lang=en