Home for the UWS Registry Extension?

[Mark Taylor]

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, Molinaro, Marco wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> minimalistic 1-point trivial opinion on side issue:
> 
> 2018-08-23 23:01 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dowler <pdowler.cadc at gmail.com>:
> 
> > Side issue: UWS already has an xsd and the de-facto namespace prefix is
> > uws, so we should not start using that prefix in this context (because even
> > if we do decide that UWSRegExt is the right idea we probably won't just
> > include the interface tagging in the main uws xsd). So we do need to pick
> > an alternate prefix to use for now.... ure?  foo?
> >
> 
> would be uwsre that bad?

I consulted the handy table in Section 5 of the RegTAP 1.1 PR
(http://www.ivoa.net/documents/RegTAP/20180731/PR-RegTAP-1.1-20180731.html#tth_sEc5)
to see if there is some usual way to construct these; it seems not.

In absence of that, to muddy the waters still further: how about urx?

--
Mark Taylor   Astronomical Programmer   Physics, Bristol University, UK
m.b.taylor at bris.ac.uk +44-117-9288776  http://www.star.bris.ac.uk/~mbt/