SimpleDALRegExt 1.1 WD
Mark Taylor
M.B.Taylor at bristol.ac.uk
Mon Jun 13 11:58:10 CEST 2016
Markus,
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, Markus Demleitner wrote:
> Dear Registry,
>
> I completely forgot to announce here the availability of the
> SimpleDALRegExt 1.1 working draft at
>
> http://ivoa.net/documents/SimpleDALRegExt/20160525/
>
> I'd like to move to RFC fairly quicky (the minimal WG review time
> expires early July, so that's what I'm heading for). If you've not
> had a look during internal WG review, I'd appreciate if you could do
> so now. If you've had a look at the internal WD, there's little
> that's changed:
Some minor, and not-particularly-well-informed, suggestions:
Abstract:
"... the four fundamental data access protocols - SCS, SIA, SSA, SLA"
I'm not sure that fundamental is the best way to describe them,
especially post-TAP. Replace "fundamental" by "simple" or
"first generation"? Or just use the list of names without further
editorialising?
Sec 2:
The Note about how "many clients discover the standard endpoints..."
is useful. Could it be accompanied by a note or discussion about
what the recommended way to do that is?
Sec 3.3.6:
This section declares itself to be a temporary measure for services
deployed prior to the SSA Recommendation (presumably SSA 1.03,
Dec 2007?). Should it be retired or deprecated now?
Appendix B.1:
Heading is "Changes from PR-1.0" - I think that should be REC-1.0.
Also, there are some funny quote characters (U+201E?) in the LaTeX
source:
% grep indicating.the.largest SimpleDALRegExt.tex
is „Cutout” or „Mosaic”, indicating the largest
is „Cutout” or „Mosaic”, indicating the largest
is there any reason?
Mark
--
Mark Taylor Astronomical Programmer Physics, Bristol University, UK
m.b.taylor at bris.ac.uk +44-117-9288776 http://www.star.bris.ac.uk/~mbt/
More information about the registry
mailing list