Identifiers 2.0 Public RFC results

[Francoise Genova]

Dear colleagues

Le 07/10/2015 17:24, Accomazzi, Alberto a écrit :
> Hi Markus,
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Markus Demleitner 
> <msdemlei at ari.uni-heidelberg.de 
> <mailto:msdemlei at ari.uni-heidelberg.de>> wrote:
>
>
>     Ok, I've made an attempt at language expressing that in volute rev.
>     3090 (see the diff without checking out using
>     svn diff -r3089:3090
>     https://volute.g-vo.org/svn/trunk/projects/registry/Identifiers
>     )
>
...
>
> Does this matter in the end?  Not sure, but if we want to leave the 
> door open to having resolving services within the VO interoperate with 
> different identifiers (including http URIs, DOIs, etc), I think we 
> need to worry about these things, and consider all possible use 
> cases.  For instance, I have been contemplating whether the legacy use 
> of the Dataset Identifiers originally implemented by the NASA Archives 
> (http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0611575) can be handled through the VO 
> infrastructure. Going forward, we may want to reuse resolving services 
> for DOIs, and hopefully the discussions in Sydney will show how much 
> interest there is on this topic.  So clarifying what a resolver is is 
> rather critical.
I strongly agree, both on the legacy aspects and on the look forward

Francoise
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/registry/attachments/20151007/fe6d40d2/attachment.html>