Harvesting experiences

Matthew Graham mjg at cacr.caltech.edu
Tue Apr 29 08:38:37 PDT 2008


Hi,

That was my understanding as well which is why I flagged these items.

	Cheers,

	Matthew
On Apr 29, 2008, at 8:10 AM, Gretchen Greene wrote:

> I thought the plan was for the initial VOR 1.0 populations that we  
> would do
> a 'fresh' harvest and not have
> Deleted resources,  then for ongoing operations,  the deleted  
> resources
> would be included so that we can
> Keep synchronization.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registry at eso.org [mailto:owner-registry at eso.org] On  
> Behalf Of
> Guy Rixon
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 5:50 AM
> To: KevinBenson
> Cc: Matthew Graham; IVOA Registry WG
> Subject: Re: Harvesting experiences
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> independent of the details of OAI, I see a practical problem with
> returning deleted records in that we build up many of these over
> time. I think it could bog down the harvesting. So this is at least
> "fix later" if not "fix RSN".
>
> Cheers,
> Guy
>
> On 29 Apr 2008, at 10:28, KevinBenson wrote:
>
>> For (3)  is there a problem with returning deleted records?
>>
>> Matthew Graham wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I did a harvest of all registries in the RofR this evening and  
>>> found:
>>>
>>> (3) There are deleted records being returned:
>
>



More information about the registry mailing list