Data and services
Tony Linde
ael at star.le.ac.uk
Fri Sep 12 12:50:49 PDT 2003
> How about "AstroDataService"?
Or to follow Peter's lead: SiderealDataService :)
Cheers,
Tony.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registry at eso.org [mailto:owner-registry at eso.org]
> On Behalf Of Ray Plante
> Sent: 12 September 2003 20:36
> To: registry at ivoa.net
> Subject: RE: Data and services
>
>
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Tony Linde wrote:
> > I'd forgotten about Coverage. Maybe SkyService should stay so that
> > when solar and stp people create their schemas they can have a
> > SolarService and STPService.
>
> Coverage has three components: spatial, spectral, and temporal. A
> resource need only map to one of these to have "Coverage".
>
> > Maybe we need a DataService which includes a pointer to the
> root data
> > collection plus any other data-ish metadata and then SkyService,
> > SolarService and STPService can inherit from that?
>
> We should definitely allow this pointer; however, we should
> not require
> that the data collection be registered separately.
>
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Robert Hanisch wrote:
> > > And should Coverage be renamed to SkyCoverage? Or is there enough
> > > commonality between 'coverage' in the disciplines to deal
> with the
> > > differences with one or two optional elements?
> > Solar, Planetary, and STP will have different concepts for coverage.
>
> How about "AstroDataService"?
>
> cheers,
> Ray
>
More information about the registry
mailing list