On ID "sameness"
Ray Plante
rplante at poplar.ncsa.uiuc.edu
Wed Feb 5 13:07:06 PST 2003
Hey Arnold,
> I think I'm seeing the light.
> The solution may lie in imposing a logical mapping between objects,
> name spaces, and IDs, leaving that mapping up to the issuer of the
> object.
Cool. I think we're on the same page there.
> As far as I am concerned we can equate name spaces and IDs.
> But it does require a fully hierarchical object space.
>
> I admit that this is more of a use case than a requirements
> discussion. But I think it clarifies a number of things.
(Hey, use cases were called for as well!)
I agree. I, too, concluded that a hierarchical space would be helpful.
(I've been thinking about a form based on the URI standard; however, the
functionality is identical to your examples. No matter--just an
implementation detail.)
> As far into those remainders as they are identical there
> is sameness, but you would probably have to look at the metadata to
> determine the degree of sameness. For instance, CXO:2000 in
> NASA:HEASARC:CXO:2000 and SAO:CDA:CXO:2000 indicate that we are
> pointing to the same observation
I think this is a repeat of what you just said, but I would that one would
have to look at the metadata for NASA:HEASARC:CXO:2000 to know that it
refers to the same observation as SAO:CDA:CXO:2000 as there is no a priori
way of knowing that those common parts are intentional or accidental.
> As I said at the beginning, I would suggest that:
> 1. We assume/require a one-to-one logical mapping between objects,
> name spaces, and IDs
> 2. The object (ns, ID) space be strictly hierarchical
> 3. The issuer of objects in a given name space be responsible for
> issuing authoritative IDs
I agree with all three of these. Strictly speaking, I see 2. as a
technical choice that should be motivated by some required functionality.
The functionality you describe (I think) is the ability to determine in
one object logically contains another. Personally, I motivate a hierarchy
by the need to be able to access descriptions of objects from an ID. It
is likely that a description may not be explicitly available for all
objects that are assigned an ID; however, if we require that a registered
description exist for at least the top-level containing object, then you
can work your way up the hierarchy until you discover something about the
object.
Thanks for the use cases!
cheers,
Ray
More information about the registry
mailing list