URI fragments in IVOA specifications
Norman Gray
norman at astro.gla.ac.uk
Thu Apr 5 12:44:45 PDT 2012
Dick, hello.
On 2012 Apr 5, at 18:58, Dick Shaw wrote:
> 1. Though I understand your original motivation, to correct what you see as a problem with how URI fragments are used in practice, I think I would re-cast the content of your document more positively. That is, make the emphasis on best practices for usage of URIs in the IVOA context. Certainly there is a place for discussing caveats, but many potential readers will benefit more by seeing examples of proper usage than be being admonished about improper usage.
Ah, thanks for this.
I very much take your point, and agree that the current document does have a rather admonitory tone. This is I think the consequence of the text having descended from a not-quite-objection I raised at an inconveniently late stage of the VOEvent approval process (the resolution at the time was to defer consideration of the issue to a later broader forum).
I'll recast the text over the weekend, to phrase it in the rather more positive tone you suggest. Thanks again for the suggestion.
Best wishes,
Norman
--
Norman Gray : http://nxg.me.uk
SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK
More information about the interop
mailing list