Request to add some parameter types to CEA schema

[Paul Harrison]

On 2007-10 -11, at 00:20, Guy Rixon wrote:

>
> If I were to choose, I would make the types URIs leading to registry
> resources, as is done for VOSpace. This would open the vocbulary  
> and save us
> some discussion time.
>
>

I have nothing against doing that, as it makes it easier to change in  
the future without issuing a new schema. However,  as we have learnt  
from VOSpace, a basic vocabulary does need to be defined along with  
the standard to enable interoperability - it is not sufficient to  
leave this completely open or implementers will not know how to use  
the most basic elements of the intended vocabulary.

Cheers,
	Paul.

Dr. Paul Harrison
JBCA, Manchester University
http://www.manchester.ac.uk/jodrellbank