<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>As I understand it, the discussion of RFC comments should go in the mail list and the resolution posted to the twiki.<br></div>Several of Markus' comments were addressed in his thread, but I'll add some more.<br><br>"(1) I would at least like to see one "catalogue data" use case. I will contribute one if you ask me, but frankly, I'd say the <a href="https://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/VizieR" class="gmail-twikiLink">VizieR</a>
people have the most comprehensive picture of what kinds of errors are
out there and what people do with them. The very least, I guess, would
be "A client wants to plot error bars without further user
intervention"."<br><br></div><div>The use cases for this effort has been established for some years now. This doesn't seem to be the appropriate time to add.<br></div><div><br>The catalogue case is being considered via the Source properties thread that has been featured in the past couple interops. That effort will determine new requirements, most of which will be satisfied by extending the measurement model content (eg: for a Redshift measure). It may generate new requirements on the core model.. which would need to be considered at that point.<br><br></div><div>Mark<br><br></div></div>