<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>Paul,<br><br>The question is still a good one in general, but I don't think there are any circulars in the STC component model usage.<br></div></div>What Coords elements are you seeing in CoordSys?<br></div><br></div>btw: there is still discussion about the packaging.. so that my change in future revisions. It went this way after the last interop where we discussed splitting things up a bit.<br><div><div><br>Mark<br><br><div><br><div><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Paul Harrison <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paul.harrison@manchester.ac.uk" target="_blank">paul.harrison@manchester.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
I was looking at the latest STC modelling in VO-DML (<a href="http://volute.g-vo.org/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/models/STC2/prototype/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://volute.g-vo.org/svn/<wbr>trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/<wbr>models/STC2/prototype/</a>) and see that it has been factored out into 3 separate files. This leads me to a question about the scope of inclusions in VO-DML<br>
<br>
STCCoords-2.0 includes STCCoordSys-2.0 (and IVOA)<br>
STCCoordSys-2.0 only IVOA<br>
<br>
however, STCCoordSys-2.0 makes references to types that are defined in STCCoords-2.0 - is this legal?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Paul.<br>
<br>
<br>
Dr. Paul Harrison<br>
JBO, Manchester University<br>
<a href="http://www.manchester.ac.uk/jodrellbank" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.manchester.ac.uk/<wbr>jodrellbank</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>