Entangled Models [Was: MCT - model document delivery.]

CresitelloDittmar, Mark mdittmar at cfa.harvard.edu
Tue Sep 29 18:41:08 CEST 2020


On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 7:58 AM Markus Demleitner <
msdemlei at ari.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:

> Let me ask back here (because I find that consequence rather
> unwelcome): Say we have the following dependency graph on the DMs:
>                             |- Spectral
                            |- TimeSeries
coord - meas - dataset - cube
       `---- phot ----'

I'm wondering how that works in the higher level products...
I've added TimeSeries and Spectral to your hierarchy chart.
   * Having given this no thought.. If these are isolated models, I'd
expect that Spectral and TimeSeries could not be expressed as a simple
extension of Cube (as the current prototype model is).

If I'm a provider of Spectra, Photometry filters, TimeSeries, etc..
  1) How do I know that I should provide annotations for the 'data' as
Measurements and Coordinates?
  2) From that perspective wouldn't I expect that annotating as a
TimeSeries should be all I need to do?
      o If I neglect/fail to provide them, it is a valid TimeSeries, but
one with no Measurements.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dm/attachments/20200929/b781442e/attachment.html>

More information about the dm mailing list