[Obscore1.1] WD comments: Original content
Louys Mireille
mireille.louys at unistra.fr
Fri Jul 10 22:01:52 CEST 2015
Hi all again ,
For the strategy to present the articulation between Obscore 1.1 , the
previous ObsCore 1.0 and the coming Dataset metadata , I agree this
should be clearer.
The strategy is to be discussed among authors.
I will be mostly away from my email in the next weeks, so I circulate an
intermediate version that takes into account all comments on the "New
content" first.
All recent modifications are in purple , in addition to the green parts
I changed before SESTO.
Your comments are welcome for this intermediate version.
More comments on the rephrasing strategy below.
Thanks and best wishes , Mireille.
Le 24/06/2015 22:07, CresitelloDittmar, Mark a écrit :
> .... second part
>
> 2: Original content
> ===============
>
> One of the challenges in doing the DatasetMetadata/Cube work was in
> determining exactly what ObsCore was in relation to the other models
> (Spectral/Char/STC). It seems that we have an opportunity to clarify
> that relation while we have the document open... so long as that work
> does not delay the delivery of the primary purpose of the update.
>
> I think it would be beneficial to add/change language to emphasize
> that ObsCore is a 'flattened view' of an Observation/Dataset model.
> example: pg 10
> ".. the purpose of this document is twofold: 1) to define a simple
> data model to describe observational data, "
>
I think Obscore is a real Data model , it is designed with classes from
Characterisation, Spectrum , SSA ( Access) and is modeled in UML .
The way these classes are used in a TAP service named ObsTAP is the
flattened version of the ObsCore DM .
I see ObsCore as a prototype of Dataset metadata DM , ( less classes
and less attributes) ; historically Dataset metadata has been created as
a refactorisation and homogeneisation of the existing Data models (
Spectrum, Char, STC, etc) .
I think the historical path is needed as it explains the development of
the ideas with time.
It is not natural to think general first and then apply the general view
. Iterations and refinements are needed and this is what happened.
We should highlight the consistency obtained in the DatasetDM , but
probably not only in the various specs citing each others , but in a
general page that could show the dependencies between the different
modeling efforts.
> could be rephrased to clarify this point.
>
agreed
> example: pg 11; second paragraph of section 3 can better clarify the
> relation of ObsCore to these other models.
>
>
> The diagrams/UML in the document are to illustrate the mapping of this
> view to the corresponding IVOA standard model(s). Ultimately, I think
> it would be more clear if there were 2 sides to the diagram, with some
> indicator matching the respective elements:
> on the left: ObsCore table column element
> on the right: corresponding model element
>
> ivoa.ObsCore.table_name ---- ObsDataset -> Target -> Name
> ivoa.ObsCore.s_resolution_min ---- ObsDataset -> Char ->
> SpatialAxis -> Resolution -> Bounds -> Limits -> LoLimit
>
I think the table in B5 already shows this mapping, and Table 6 and 7 at
the end of the document too.
> I'm not sure how that would be shown graphically, and may be more work
> than benefit.
>
> If Section 3 is representing the 'placeholder' model which ObsCore
> views, this could be made more clear. ie: if Section 3 is fulfilling
> the same purpose as the upcoming DatasetMetadata document
--
Mireille Louys , Maître de conférences
Centre de Données ( CDS) Icube & Télécom Physique Strasbourg, Pôle API
Observatoire de Strasbourg 300, boulevard Sébastien Brant
11, Rue de l'Université CS 10413
67000 Strasbourg F - 67412 ILLKIRCH Cedex
http://astro.unistra.fr http://www.telecom-physique.fr
tel : 03 68 85 24 34
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WD-ObsCore-v1.1-20150710.pdf
Type: 0/unknown
Size: 2124087 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dm/attachments/20150710/29720b56/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the dm
mailing list