ObsCore update discussion : adding Axes information in Obscore table
Mark Taylor
m.b.taylor at bristol.ac.uk
Mon Apr 27 10:42:34 CEST 2015
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Markus Demleitner wrote:
> Now, I admit introducing a second table to obscore is a bit drastic,
> and opposition to that would be well justified. Which brings us back
> to the options for denormalization considered in the mail referenced
> above.
>
> Arrays (one each for axis type and axis length) would be almost ideal
> here, but I don't think we can really formally introduce array
> processing in ADQL. Can we?
I will just note here that from the output point of view this would
not be problematic: VOTables are, like FITS, quite happy with
array-valued columns. But I'm not making any comment on the
impact that the introduction of array processing would have on
the rest of the TAP/ADQL standards and implementation stack.
--
Mark Taylor Astronomical Programmer Physics, Bristol University, UK
m.b.taylor at bris.ac.uk +44-117-9288776 http://www.star.bris.ac.uk/~mbt/
More information about the dm
mailing list