[obs-tap]:updates on the Proposed recommendation + new document
Arnold Rots
arots at head.cfa.harvard.edu
Fri Jul 8 06:36:59 PDT 2011
Just two quick comments. Both highlight how this standard is still
heavily slanted toward optical images.
- Arnold
Mireille Louys wrote:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Dear Arnold, Dear all,
>
>
> > o_stat_error is an interesting case. Since our unit is counts, the
> > proper value would be "POISSON"; I realize that that is not a double,
> > but what else can we give as a value?
> >
> This was meant only for quantitative estimation of the error and does
> not cover the statistical properties of the signal.
I realize that, but the problem is that one can't give a single
quantitative value in the case of Poisson noise. However, identifying
it as Poisson does immediately provide the value for each point in the
image.
>
> >>
> >> Ian Evans noticed the inconsistency in units for spatial resolution
> >> between the Tables 1, 4, 5, and 6 (arcsec vs. deg); what should it be?
> >> I assume deg?
> >> See also s_stat_error in Table 5.
> >>
> We agreed in previous iterations to have resolution and errors in a
> convenient and handy unit: arcsec for space and s for time , for
> instance because they are usually given that way in instrument
> descriptions and scientific papers.
Too bad the same reasoning was not applied to the EM units; when I
complained about the requirement to use m, I was told that it's only a
number seen by software that can easily be turned into a more
convenient unit for display to the user :-P
>
>
>
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arnold H. Rots Chandra X-ray Science Center
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory tel: +1 617 496 7701
60 Garden Street, MS 67 fax: +1 617 495 7356
Cambridge, MA 02138 arots at head.cfa.harvard.edu
USA http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~arots/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the dm
mailing list