Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5

[Martin @ ROE]

Brian Thomas wrote:

> 	Well, my concept of BasicQ (and I don't think I'm alone on this)
> 	is that it was for _holding a single value_, not to make something
> 	"really simple". 

In that case can we change the name to SingleQuantity?  There's not 
enough distinction between 'Core' and 'Basic'!

-- 
Martin Hill
Software Engineer, AstroGrid (ROE)
07901 55 24 66