<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace">Dear Apps & DAL,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace">an erratum has been proposed for </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace">Simple Cone Search v1.03.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace">You can find it here:</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace"><a href="https://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/SCS-1_03-Err-2">https://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/SCS-1_03-Err-2</a><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace">and below there's the DAL thread that started </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace">this update.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace">Apps WG is added to this thread to gather </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace">comments and feedback on the client impact </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace">assessment for the erratum itself.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace">Thanks in advance and</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace">Cheers</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace"> Marco</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace">PS - Mark/Markus: check whether I acted </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace">on the text as expected.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Il giorno ven 19 nov 2021 alle ore 10:58 Markus Demleitner <<a href="mailto:msdemlei@ari.uni-heidelberg.de">msdemlei@ari.uni-heidelberg.de</a>> ha scritto:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi Mark,<br>
<br>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 02:34:51PM +0000, Mark Taylor wrote:<br>
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2021, Markus Demleitner wrote:<br>
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 01:19:59PM +0100, Molinaro, Marco wrote:<br>
> > > I took the liberty to draft the erratum:<br>
> > > <br>
> > > <a href="https://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/SCS-1_03-Err-2" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/SCS-1_03-Err-2</a><br>
> > <br>
> > Thanks for making that move. I've expanded the erratum a bit, and<br>
> > I'd now be happy with it.<br>
> <br>
> I prefer Marco's original<br>
> <br>
> "The XML content of the response must be compliant with the<br>
> VOTable Recommendation."<br>
<br>
Fair enough -- unless someone else speaks out for the lengthy<br>
<br>
> "Simple Cone Search services MUST return VOTable version 1 documents.<br>
> This means that clients will have to handle the namespace URIs<br>
> <a href="http://www.ivoa.net/xml/VOTable/v1.1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.ivoa.net/xml/VOTable/v1.1</a>,<br>
> <a href="http://www.ivoa.net/xml/VOTable/v1.2" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.ivoa.net/xml/VOTable/v1.2</a>, and<br>
> <a href="http://www.ivoa.net/xml/VOTable/v1.3" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.ivoa.net/xml/VOTable/v1.3</a>, where the last namespace<br>
> will be used for all future VOTable 1 versions.<br>
> For forward compatibility clients should ignore unknown elements<br>
> and attributes in these documents as per the IVOA schema versioning<br>
> policies."<br>
<br>
totally feel free to revert -- though I can't say I like either of<br>
"XML content" and "compliant with" very much, which is what made be<br>
try a re-formulation in the first place; perhaps we can go for "SCS<br>
responses are returned in the VOTable format"?)<br>
<br>
> I'm dubious also about Markus's mention of BINARY serialization,<br>
> only to point out that it's not relevant here:<br>
> <br>
> "We note that, in particular, the main interoperability problem even<br>
> in the days of SCS 1.03, lack of support for BINARY-serialised tables,<br>
> is orthogonal to the problem addressed here, as BINARY serialisation<br>
> was already part of VOTable 1.1."<br>
> <br>
> I would therefore prefer to delete the middle paragraph of the r2<br>
> impact assessment.<br>
<br>
Yeah, that might be hedging too much, and I don't think it's been a<br>
problem in the last 10 years or so any more. So, yes, chuck it out.<br>
<br>
-- Markus<br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><font face="monospace">Marco Molinaro</font></div><div><font face="monospace">INAF - Istituto Nazionale di AstroFisica</font></div><div><font face="monospace">Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste</font></div><div><font face="monospace">email <a href="mailto:marco.molinaro@inaf.it" target="_blank">marco.molinaro@inaf.it</a></font></div><div><span style="font-family:monospace">tel. [+39] 333 33 20 564 / 040 3199 152</span><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>