<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">OK, will write up the erratum without reference to xtype.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br clear="all"></div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div>--<br></div><div>Patrick Dowler<br></div>Canadian Astronomy Data Centre<br></div>Victoria, BC, Canada<br></div></div></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 10:17, François Bonnarel <<a href="mailto:francois.bonnarel@astro.unistra.fr">francois.bonnarel@astro.unistra.fr</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi all,<br>
<br>
Le 03/04/2020 à 12:31, Mark Taylor a écrit :<br>
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, Markus Demleitner wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Hi Pat,<br>
>><br>
>> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 12:52:03PM -0700, Patrick Dowler wrote:<br>
>>> I think this is really a bug requiring an erratum, which I would be happy<br>
>>> to write up asap.<br>
>> I'm agreed on the bug nature, and I'm grateful for the the write-up<br>
>><br>
>>> * side issue: I think it would be legit for someone to also specify an<br>
>>> xtype like xtype="uri" (because I think that's already permitted and<br>
>>> matches the whole meaning of xtype) but I don't know if I would write that<br>
>>> into the erratum or not... because I don't really think it needs to be<br>
>>> written it into the specification to be allowed. Would anyone actively want<br>
>>> this written in?<br>
>> If we do that at all, that ought to be a different erratum.<br>
> It's pushing the usage of Erratum a little bit.<br>
<br>
2 cents<br>
<br>
1 ) I agree the lack of typing of ID is an erratum and should be <br>
managed so.<br>
<br>
2 ) if the xtype="uri" is to be done we can add this in DataLink 1.1<br>
<br>
3 ) What is this xtype saying ? This "ID" PARAM string helps to <br>
build an URI (in combination with accessURL) but is not an uri per se ? <br>
Or is that xtype for the accessURL PARAM ?<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
<br>
François<br>
<br>
<br>
> <br>
>> My question would be: What's the use case for that extra annotation?<br>
>> Is there anything that would evaluate it?<br>
> --<br>
> Mark Taylor Astronomical Programmer Physics, Bristol University, UK<br>
> <a href="mailto:m.b.taylor@bris.ac.uk" target="_blank">m.b.taylor@bris.ac.uk</a> +44-117-9288776 <a href="http://www.star.bris.ac.uk/~mbt/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.star.bris.ac.uk/~mbt/</a><br>
</blockquote></div>