<div dir="ltr">sorry...forgot a reply-all...<div><br></div><div>Marco </div><div><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Marco Molinaro</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:molinaro@oats.inaf.it">molinaro@oats.inaf.it</a>></span><br>Date: 2017-10-11 9:27 GMT+02:00<br>Subject: Re: Simple Cone Search 1.1 - (new) internal WD<br>To: Walter Landry <<a href="mailto:wlandry@caltech.edu">wlandry@caltech.edu</a>><br><br><br><div dir="ltr">Hi Walter, all,<div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-10-10 18:23 GMT+02:00 Walter Landry <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wlandry@caltech.edu" target="_blank">wlandry@caltech.edu</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>Markus Demleitner <<a href="mailto:msdemlei@ari.uni-heidelberg.de" target="_blank">msdemlei@ari.uni-heidelberg.d<wbr>e</a>> wrote:<br></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>[... cut ...]</div><span class=""><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span></span><span>>> > 4 - trying or not to use UCD1+<br>
>><br>
>> Pretty please? We allow access to our tables via a number of<br>
>> protocols (SIA2, SSA, SCS, TAP). I really, really, really do not want<br>
>> to maintain different UCD's for each protocol.<br>
><br>
> True, that's a wart, but changing the UCDs *would* actually break<br>
> clients. Also, on the server side it's not *that* much of an issue.<br>
> In DaCHS, it's about 20 lines of relatively benign code -- essentially:<br>
><br>
> ucdCasts = {<br>
> "<a href="http://meta.id" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">meta.id</a>;meta.main": {"ucd": "ID_MAIN", "datatype": "char",<br>
> "arraysize": "*"},<br>
> "pos.eq.ra;meta.main": {"ucd": "POS_EQ_RA_MAIN",<br>
> "datatype": "double"},<br>
> "pos.eq.dec;meta.main": {"ucd": "POS_EQ_DEC_MAIN",<br>
> "datatype": "double"},<br>
> }<br>
><br>
> (and a bit of support code in the serialiser that's required for<br>
> SIAP, too)-- and with SCS 1.1, the datatype cast could go away.<br>
<br>
</span>I would like to provide more than 3 UCD's. They are kind of useful.<br></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>But, apart from the mandatory "trio" you can add whatever UCD you like,</div><div>actually you're more than welcome to do so.</div><div>Sorry, I don't understand the meaning of the last comment you made.</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Marco</div></font></span></div></div></div>
</div><br></div></div>