<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear DAL-ers, dear Pat,<br>form a quick check to the DALI-1.1 document (I could have done this before actually),</div><div>I see that for ($2.4) Availability: VOSI-availability it still says that </div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_extra">"...this resource is always accessed as a resource</div><div class="gmail_extra">named availability that is a child of the base URL for the service."</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">In Sydney, during an OPS session, I suggested to relax this (even if there's</div><div class="gmail_extra">no MUST in the sentence, this looks clearly like a requirement).</div><div class="gmail_extra">The idea was to let availability be independent from the resources it gives</div><div class="gmail_extra">status of.</div><div class="gmail_extra">At interop this suggestion seemed not controversial, so, given it doesn't appear</div><div class="gmail_extra">on the WD I'm wondering if this happens simply because it slipped out of mind</div><div class="gmail_extra">or whether we need to have explicit consensus from the DAL members </div><div class="gmail_extra">before modifying it (if so maybe also Apps and GWS should be taken into account).</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Cheers,</div><div class="gmail_extra"> Marco</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-02-08 13:16 GMT+01:00 François Bonnarel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:francois.bonnarel@astro.unistra.fr" target="_blank">francois.bonnarel@astro.unistra.fr</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear all,<br>
<br>
This email to advertize you that the DALI 1.1 working draft, edited by Pat Dowler is available since last week on the IVOA website, in the "Standards" section.<br>
The draft was actually finalized during Sydney interop and no changes occured from the authors since then.<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
François and Marco<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>