<div dir="ltr">Hi,<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-09-04 11:10 GMT+02:00 Markus Demleitner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:msdemlei@ari.uni-heidelberg.de" target="_blank">msdemlei@ari.uni-heidelberg.de</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<span class=""><br>
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:14:25AM +0200, Marco Molinaro wrote:<br>
> Also the two of them live on different levels of negotiation and enquiry to<br>
> the service.<br>
><br>
> This can be read from:<br>
> - §2.3.7 for TAP-1.0<br>
> - DALI-1.0 §3.2.4 for TAP-1.1<br>
<br>
</span>Hm -- I'd like to have some explicit language on MAXREC and TOP. Ok,<br>
maybe I'm stupid, and I'm certainly not terribly good in reading<br>
standards, but the (intended) interplay between MAXREC and TOP wasn't<br>
clear to me, and I don't think it's self-evident that TOP doesn't<br>
trigger the overflow warning. So:<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It was not about being stupid or not reading a spec.</div><div>It was: there's some text that tries to explain more </div><div>or less what we discussed, but probably not enough.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span class=""><br>
> Should we add some more explicit wording to help both server<br>
> and client side implementations understand this?<br>
> (Markus already proposed a "clobber" addition)<br>
> If so, I think this is an "errata/feature" for DALI more than a TAP one,<br>
> but I'm not absolute on this.<br>
<br>
</span>As DALI is even more remove from ADQL than TAP is and this is really<br>
a thing between ADQL and TAP, I'm all for putting something into TAP<br>
(it could go into ADQL, too, but TAP already refers to ADQL, but ADQL<br>
doesn't really refer to TAP).<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I would not put it in ADQL, I feel it's more a general case whatever the query</div><div>language accepted by TAP (as far as a TOP-thing exists in it).</div><div>So, probably, yes, it should go in TAP.</div><div><br></div><div>Marco</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Markus<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>