<div dir="ltr">Hi Pierre, all,<div>I think the errata would be nice, also considering Michele Sanguillon question on the dal list:</div><div><br><div><a href="http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dal/2015-January/007020.html">http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dal/2015-January/007020.html</a></div><div><br></div><div>Maybe yours and Michele's discoveries on the SSA-1.1 can be joined in one correction step.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div> Marco<br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-11-18 15:35 GMT+01:00 Pierre Le Sidaner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pierre.lesidaner@obspm.fr" target="_blank">pierre.lesidaner@obspm.fr</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Thanks Doug<br>
<br>
That was also my idea of testing errata, that's why I have send the first email also to TCG<br>
<br>
Regards<span class=""><font color="#888888"><br>
Pierre</font></span><div class=""><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 11/18/2014 03:21 PM, Douglas Tody wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
The theoretical spectra example was always pretty rough - it would be<br>
great if it were updated. Perhaps (for the TCG) this would qualify as<br>
an errata? - Doug<br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Carlos Rodrigo wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi<br>
<br>
Given that the example for theoretical spectra in the document is based in one of our services, I<br>
think that I should say something here... :)<br>
<br>
Doug's answer has clarified most of the things that I intended to write<br>
<br>
In fact, there are several metadata that are mandatory and are not in the example:<br>
<br>
Char.SpatialAxis.Coverage.<u></u>Location.Value<br>
Char.SpatialAxis.Coverage.<u></u>Bounds.Extent<br>
Char.TimeAxis.Coverage.<u></u>Location.Value<br>
Char.SpectralAxis.Coverage.<u></u>Location.Value<br>
Char.SpectralAxis.Coverage.<u></u>Bounds.Extent<br>
<br>
The first three ones does not (usually) make sense for theoretical spectra so I think that we can<br>
apply what Doug says.<br>
<br>
The last two ones make sense for theoretical spectra and they are not in the example, so I think<br>
that it would be good to add them. In fact, at first sight, I guess that the example was writen so<br>
much time ago and it does not reflect some changes in the document, so it would be nice to rewrite<br>
it a little. In fact, there are more things that should be changed in the example. For instance,<br>
url's are outdated and they don't work (the domain <a href="http://laeff.inta.es" target="_blank">laeff.inta.es</a> does not exist anymore)<br>
<br>
So, if it is ok, I could write an updated version of the example<br>
<br>
Carlos<br>
<br>
<br>
On 11/18/2014 02:33 PM, Douglas Tody wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Pierre -<br>
<br>
Section 4.1 of the spec addresses the issue of theory data and notes<br>
that some metadata may not have meaning for certain types of data<br>
collections such as theory data. However the section talks about query<br>
constraints (input parameter semantics) and I agree is not explicit<br>
about what to do with the query response. The implication though, and<br>
what was intended, is that if metadata such as spatial position is not<br>
meaningful for the data collection, these values should be omitted in<br>
the query response. Hence your option #2 below applies; metadata is not<br>
mandatory (i.e. may be set to null) if not defined for a specific data<br>
collection such as as theory data.<br>
<br>
- Doug<br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Pierre Le Sidaner wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Dear IVOA members<br>
<br>
I am facing a little problem with my SSA validator<br>
following the documentation metadata such as Char.SpatialAxis.Coverage.<u></u>Location.Value are<br>
mandatory in the query response<br>
but example in the text for response of Theory-SSA omit some of them.<br>
<br>
My question is :<br>
Am I badly reading the documentation ?<br>
should we modify the mandatory fields for non "observational" SSA<br>
Should we modify the example of Theorical SSA<br>
<br>
regards<br>
Pierre<br>
<br>
-- <br>
------------------------------<u></u>------------------------------<u></u>------------- <br>
Pierre Le Sidaner<br>
Observatoire de Paris<br>
<br>
Division Informatique de l'Observatoire<br>
Observatoire Virtuel 01 40 51 20 89<br>
61, avenue de l'Observatoire 75014 Paris<br>
<br>
mailto:<a href="mailto:pierre.lesidaner@obspm.fr" target="_blank">pierre.lesidaner@obspm.<u></u>fr</a><br>
<a href="http://vo.obspm.fr" target="_blank">http://vo.obspm.fr</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<u></u>------------------------------<u></u>-------------- <br>
<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
------------------------------<u></u>------------------------------<u></u>-------------<br>
Pierre Le Sidaner<br>
Observatoire de Paris<br>
<br>
Division Informatique de l'Observatoire<br>
Observatoire Virtuel 01 40 51 20 89<br>
61, avenue de l'Observatoire 75014 Paris<br>
<br>
mailto:<a href="mailto:pierre.lesidaner@obspm.fr" target="_blank">pierre.lesidaner@obspm.<u></u>fr</a><br>
<a href="http://vo.obspm.fr" target="_blank">http://vo.obspm.fr</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<u></u>------------------------------<u></u>--------------<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div>