TAPRegExt fine grained differences between tables
    Markus Demleitner 
    msdemlei at ari.uni-heidelberg.de
       
    Wed Jun 10 09:32:16 CEST 2015
    
    
  
Hi Walter,
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:53:51PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> We have a variety of tables with different backends all served
> through a single TAP endpoint.  Because the backends are different,
> they support different optional components of TAP.  Reading the
> TAPRegExt standard, is it correct to say that there is no way to
> express these kind of fine-grained differences between the tables?
This concerns what user-defined functions are available on them?
Things like upload limits/formats?  These, yes, are declared globally
per capability.  I'd recommend per table examples (for now, as per
the TAP Implementation Note, if I may say so myself) to document
where the system behaves in ways surprising to users.
Your system sounds fairly funky.  I wonder if we could spare five
minutes in the "Progress on TAP and  ADQL" session and you feel like
describing what you're doing and why -- fringe cases often help
identify where we get it wrong.
Cheers,
          Markus
    
    
More information about the dal
mailing list