vo-dml in votable

[Marco Molinaro]

Hi,
I suppose the three examples are

http://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/samples/votable/VOTable_Prop4a.xml
http://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/samples/votable/VOTable_Prop4b.xml
<http://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/samples/votable/VOTable_Prop4a.xml>
http://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/samples/votable/VOTable_Prop4c.xml
<http://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/samples/votable/VOTable_Prop4a.xml>

Cheers,
    Marco

2015-02-12 8:09 GMT+01:00 Pierre Fernique <Pierre.Fernique at astro.unistra.fr>
:

>  Dear App members,
>
> May I emphasise the Gerard's mail.
>
> VOTable is a key element of the VO. The VODML serialization in VOTable
> discussed here will have probably a big impact on our standards and
> applications  - for the best I hope. So please take time to look carefully
> the Gerard's proposal and do not hesitate to bring your contribution.
>
> The fastest ways to have an clear idea of the goal is to have a look on
> this example and the 2 other variants:
>
>
> http://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/samples/votable/VOTable_Prop4a.xml
>
> http://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/samples/votable/VOTable_Prop4a.xml
>
> http://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/samples/votable/VOTable_Prop4a.xml
>
> Thanks for your contribution
> Best regards
> Pierre Fernique
>
>
> Le 11/02/2015 17:02, Gerard Lemson a écrit :
>
>  Dear all
> It would be nice if we could quickly agree how to annotate VOTable
> elements with metadata pointing to VO-DMl data models.
> In the votable/vo-dml session in Banff we came to a decision to add a new
> element to VOTable that would represent this mapping and would take the
> place of the utype attributes we had assumed to use for that in the current
> mapping document in
> https://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/MappingDMtoVOTable-v1.0.docx
> .
> The detailed design of this element was still left open and I sent out an
> email shortly after the interop in which I made some suggestions, which I
> thought I had adequately illustrated with examples of the possible XML
> schema snippets. Maybe this was not clear, so I have updated the contents of
>
> https://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/samples/votable
> It now contains for three possible designs, labeled 4a, 4b and 4c, full
> VOTable schemas and three corresponding versions of a VOTable following
> these schemas and showing the different ways to annotate the same tables.
>
>  E.g.
> https://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/samples/votable/VOTable-1.3_vodml4a.xsd
> is a possible new schema and
>
> https://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/samples/votable/VOTable_Prop4a.xml
> an annotated VOTable following that design.
>
>  Note that in the three different proposals only the *content* of the
> <VODML> elements, as described by the structure of the VODMLAnnotaiton
> complexType definition, is different. Their association to PARAM, GROUP,
> PARAMref and FIELDref elements is the same.
>
>  Please let me know if this is still not clear or comment on the design
> possibilities.
>
>  Cheers
> Gerard
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Gerard Lemson <gerard.lemson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all
>>
>> During the VO-DML-in-VOTable discussion at the last interop we decided to
>> go
>> with (something like) proposal 4 on the wiki at
>>
>> https://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/samples/votab
>> le/VOTable_Prop4.xml
>> <https://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/vo-dml/doc/samples/votab%0Ale/VOTable_Prop4.xml>
>> Other options can be found in the same folder.
>> What we now need is to finalize the design for the XML tag(s) to add to
>> VOTable.
>> I have created a mockup of an XML schema with a complexType definition
>> reflecting the new element.
>> The design used in proposal 4 above is represented by proposal 4a in the
>> schema. It has attributes for role and actual type, and elements for
>> alternative types. Proposals 4b and 4c vary on this theme. All use a
>> simpleType definition reflecting the model-prefix+':'+vodml-id pattern
>> used
>> to refer to VO-DML elements. See the mapping document for more detailed
>> descriptions (taking into account the fact that that document will have to
>> be updated with the choice to be made here).
>>
>> Note, I am not making statements on whether these two types must be in the
>> VOTable targetnamespace. Andreas had some thoughts on this that I hope he
>> will send to the list in reply.
>>
>> And obviously the final design may differ from these proposals if
>> necessary,
>> but let's please converge on an acceptable design soon so Omar and I can
>> update the mapping document.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Gerard
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dal/attachments/20150212/e26743b3/attachment-0001.html>