WD-DataLink-1.0

[Arnold Rots]

I think this list needs some serious consideration,
particularly to make sure that the terms have
general application and that coverage is complete.

For instance, a radio beam image is no different
from a PSF. And what is the relation between an
error map and a noise map? How does that relate
to a sensitivity map. What about an exposure map?
And I thought it peculiar that the first item under
ancillary contains miscellaneous calibration data;
why isn't that under calibration? Also, the set of
calibration data types seems rather limited.

Let's not rush this list.

Cheers,

  - Arnold

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arnold H. Rots                                          Chandra X-ray
Science Center
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory                   tel:  +1 617 496
7701
60 Garden Street, MS 67                                      fax:  +1 617
495 7356
Cambridge, MA 02138
arots at cfa.harvard.edu
USA
http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~arots/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:25 AM, François Bonnarel <
francois.bonnarel at astro.unistra.fr> wrote:

> Hi all,
>     The attached file  gives a proposal for extended values for the
> semantics column described in 4.6.
>     We were considering the fact that the original list could be too short
> for our various use cases.
>     Semantics column is supposed to give the role  of the linked resource
> with respect to the original dataset
> Best regards
> Mireille Louys, Laurent Michel, François Bonnarel
>
> Le 25/10/2013 19:40, Patrick Dowler a écrit :
>
>>
>> The first official and more or less complete WD for DataLink is now
>> available in the document repository (in the Documents in Progress section).
>>
>> Direct link is here:
>>
>> http://www.ivoa.net/documents/DataLink/index.html
>>
>> There are some possible re-organisation necessary (sec 2 and 4 go
>> together and sec 3 needs to move to either before or after them). Also, the
>> allowed values in the "semantics" column are still a bit up in the air and
>> the ones presented are not final. I thought it better to get this out now.
>>
>> PS-Thaks to the co-authors and participants at the last couple of interop
>> meetings for their contributions - it all helped to bring this together
>> into what I hope is a simple and concise document.
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ivoa.net/pipermail/dal/attachments/20131112/2102ab58/attachment.html>