WD-DataLink-1.0

[Louys Mireille]

Dear all,

I agree with this first set of keywords for the semantics field in the 
description of a DataLink entry.
More practice will allow us to define finer sub-categories according to 
usage and types of data products in the future.
Cheers , Mireille.

Le 03/12/2013 00:04, Patrick Dowler a écrit :
>
> Trying to being this thread back to life since it is more or less the 
> last thing to do for DataLink...
>
> science
> calibration
> preview
> info
> auxiliary
>
> and is complete at least in the sense that you can throw anything into 
> the last category :-)
>
> The above list is broadly applicable. Other proposals are to add more 
> detail, which inherently brings more 
> engineering/energy-domain-specific kinds of terms into play.
>
> ** Questions **
>
> Can we just live with the above categories for DataLink-1.0? People 
> that implement a DataLink service are free to add additional columns 
> to the response if the need to add details... we could see from 
> experience if additional detail was needed and feasible and add 
> something later.
>
> Is there a  better name than semantics for this field that describes 
> the link? I really don't like things like "data class" or "data type" 
> for this as they are also vague and confusing.
>
>